Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00452
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Miller v. Clackamas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2015cv00133
Defendant:
Clackamas County Sheriff's Office and Stephen Steinberg
Plaintiff:
Darrell Edward Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. Batchelor
as 3:2014cv01596
Defendant:
Bruce Alan Batchelor
Plaintiff:
Leshia A. Hart Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wilkens v Edwards, et al.
as 6:2014cv00907
Defendant:
Robert Wayne Edwards and State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Wilkens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00554
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
503) 988-3377 (fax:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Abraham v. Multnomah County et al
as 6:2013cv01835
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Edward Abraham
Defendant:
Multnomah County and Dan Stanton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cason v. Blanton et al
as 6:2013cv01605
Defendant:
Larry Blanton, Deschutes County, Scott Edwards and others
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Cason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
