Cases 31 - 40 of 3,504
Lowe v. City of Manchester, Georgia et al
as 3:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Tameka Lowe
Defendant:
City of Manchester, Georgia, Chris Carpenter and Jason Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dixon v. Shiver et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Joey Dixon
Defendant:
Blake Shiver and Georgia State Patrol Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
STAGGERS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 7:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHARRARD STAGGERS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CANDICE BROSE, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
Webber v. Georgia Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robert Webber
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIXON v. SHIVER et al
as 4:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
JOEY DIXON
Defendant:
BLAKE SHIVER and GEORGIA STATE PATROL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BRYSON v. PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
IVAN BRYSON
Defendant:
PENFIELD ADDICTION MINISTRIES INC, CRYSTAL PAGE, MIKE WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
