Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01417
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BILAL et al v. COLWYN BOROUGH et al
as 2:2014cv05438
Plaintiff:
ROCHELLE BILAL and WANDA DAVIS
Defendant:
COLWYN BOROUGH , PAUL MEUSER , DANIEL RUTLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv04835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAYES v. BOROUGH OF COLWYN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv03839
Plaintiff:
JADE T. HAYES
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF COLWYN POLICE DEPARTMENT , WESLEY SEITZ and DANIEL RUTLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAYES et al v. SEPTA TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv03245
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HAYES and DIANE HAYES
Defendant:
SEPTA TRANSIT POLICE DEPARTMENT , SEPTA , SEPTA POLICE OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
LEWIS et al v. CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv04075
Plaintiff:
REGINA LEWIS , GWENDOLYN MCGEE and KEYANA HAYES
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, LOU GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Hayes v. Pennsylvania State Police et al
as 3:2013cv00657
Plaintiff:
Jason R Hayes
Defendant:
Pennsylvania State Police, The Borough Of Shenandoah, Joseph Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
