Cases 31 - 36 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00352
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Roger Estill, et al v. Georgianna Cool, et al
as 08-4316
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER ESTILL and DENISE ESTILL
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIANNA COOL, Individually and in their official capacity as members of the Holmes County, Ohio, Board of Elections, LUCILLE L. HASTINGS, Individually and in their official capacity as members of the Holmes County, Ohio, Board of Elections, WESLEY J. SCHMUCKER, Individually and in their official capacity as members of the Holmes County, Ohio, Board of Elections and others
Roger Estill, et al v. Georgianna Cool, et al
as 08-4190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER ESTILL and DENISE ESTILL
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGIANNA COOL, Individually and in their official capacity as members of the Holmes County, Ohio, Board of Elections, LUCILLE L. HASTINGS, Individually and in their official capacity as members of the Holmes County, Ohio, Board of Elections, WESLEY J. SCHMUCKER, Individually and in their official capacity as members of the Holmes County, Ohio, Board of Elections and others
GILLMAN v. SCHOOL BOARD FOR HOLMES COUNTY FLORIDA et al
as 5:2008cv00034
Defendant:
SCHOOL BOARD FOR HOLMES COUNTY, FLORIDA, SCHOOL BOARD FOR HOLMES COUNTY, FLORIDA and SCHOOL BOARD FOR HOLMES COUNTY, FLORIDA
Plaintiff:
HEATHER GILLMAN, HEATHER GILLMAN, HEATHER GILLMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Holmes County, MS et al
as 3:2007cv00275
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jones and Derrick Jones
Defendant:
Holmes County, MS, Unidentified Defendants 1-10 and T. A. McCrory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
