Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00150
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Callins v. Napolitano
as 4:2010cv00893
Plaintiff:
Patricia I. Callins
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00424
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hernandez et al v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2010cv00877
Defendant:
Alan Bersin, CBP Officer Gerardo Leza, Jr., Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
Hilario Nieto Hernandez, Diana Joseph, Gilberto Nieto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Benavides v. Napolitano et al - DO NOT DOCKET IN CASE B10CV223. CASE IS CONSOLIDATED UNDER B07CV218.
as 1:2010cv00223
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Benavides
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Hillary R. Clinton and UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GEN. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riojas v. Clinton
as 2:2010cv00055
Respondent:
Hillary Clinton
Defendant:
Randy R. Hill, Janet Napolitano and Michael J. Pitts
Petitioner:
Jaqueline Riojas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
