Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kelly v. Brown et al
as 3:2011cv00975
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kelly v. Eckert et al
as 3:2011cv00949
Defendant:
John V. Acosta, Sam Adams, Ann L. Aiken and others
503) 296-5762 (fax:
Roberta Kelly
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00619
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
King v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2011cv03048
Defendant:
David Avery, Jane Does, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Giulio v. BV CenterCal, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00482
Plaintiff:
Keri Giulio
Defendant:
BV CenterCal, LLC, CenterCal Associates, LLC, CenterCal Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Giulio v. BV Centercal, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00481
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Giulio
Defendant:
BV CenterCal, LLC, Centercal Associates, LLC,, CenterCal Properties, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
King v. Capps et al
as 6:2008cv06195
Plaintiff:
Robert Haden King, Jr
Defendant:
Joe E. Capps, Ron Myers, Wade Scrogham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keyter v. Haggerty et al
as 3:2008cv00545
Plaintiff:
Anthony Keyter
Defendant:
Ancer L. Haggerty, Ann Aiken, Garr M. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
