Cases 31 - 40 of 455
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Johnson v. Trump et al
as 2:2023cv01183
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Donald J Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01176
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bruce v. A C A Residential L L C et al
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Robert F Bruce
Defendant:
A C A Residential L L C, Michael Franklin and Joy Till
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Centeno v. Lafayette Home Improvement L L C et al
as 6:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Hollie Centeno
Defendant:
Lafayette Home Improvement L L C doing business as Southside Roofing and Billy Savely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hassen v. Bowman et al
as 3:2023cv01027
Not Classified By Court:
City of Ruston Police Department
Plaintiff:
LaBrittany Hassen
Defendant:
Chris Bowman, Hannah Bowman, A Plus Medical, LLC d/b/a Michael Brooks Family Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
