Cases 31 - 40 of 109
MILLER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv00418
Plaintiff:
TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER and HELENE TONIQUE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CLINTON FOUNDATION, HILARY CLINTON, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETTIS v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2019cv03625
Defendant:
MONICA MILLER, UNKNOWN OWNER OF DC EXPRESS TOWING INC., DENEIL BETTIS and others
Plaintiff:
JEROME BETTIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MILLER v. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
as 1:2018cv02144
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY MILLER
Defendant:
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL LLC et al
as 1:2018cv01101
Defendant:
DC METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOERS, MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KELLY MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
CHAPMAN et al v. U.S. BANK et al
as 1:2017cv02636
Plaintiff:
BERT E. CHAPMAN and LAMAR C. CHAPMAN
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, GINNIE MAE, FREDDIE MAC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALDE et al v. DUKE et al
as 1:2017cv01976
Plaintiff:
HATIM BALDE , JUNNIOR ALBERTO MATUTE BANEGAS , CELINDA ARACELY RODRIGUEZ LEMUS and others
Defendant:
THOMAS HOMAN , ELAINE DUKE , MATTHEW T. ALBENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
MILLER v. FARRINGTON et al
as 1:2017cv01280
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MILLER
Defendant:
SARAH FARRINGTON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BLUMENTHAL et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, BRIAN SCHATZ and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
HAROLD H. BRUFF, PETER SMITH, BOB CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
