Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
BLUMENTHAL et al v. TRUMP
as 1:2017cv01154
Plaintiff:
RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, BRIAN SCHATZ and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
HAROLD H. BRUFF, PETER SMITH, BOB CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Viol. of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SPILLER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2016cv02059
Plaintiff:
PERRY SPILLER and JAMES MCCRAY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA , TIMOTHY MURPHY, ROBERT BARILLARO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BARKSDALE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01120
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT BARKSDALE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STUART F. DELERY, JOHN D. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00710
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SINGH et al v. MCCONVILLE et al
as 1:2016cv00581
Plaintiff:
KANWAR BIR SINGH , HARPAL SINGH and SATWINDER SINGH
Defendant:
JAMES C. MCCONVILLE , DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , ASHTON B. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SINGH v. CARTER et al
as 1:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
SIMRATPAL SINGH
Defendant:
ASHTON B. CARTER , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE , PATRICK J. MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MURPHY v. FEDERAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv02217
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
FEDERAL CORPORATION, JAMES E. FINCH, SCOTT A. RAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
