Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2016cv02852
Plaintiff:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP , Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials, Inc. , Victoria Arzu and others
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners, Charlotte Nash, Jace Brooks and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Gardner v. Kelly
as 4:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Gardner
Defendant:
Cindy Murphy Kelly and Chatham Savannah Authority for the Homeless (CSAH)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Murphy v. Clayton County DHS
as 1:2015cv04491
Plaintiff:
Cazavius Murphy
Defendant:
Clayton County DHS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Walton v. Deal et al
as 1:2015cv03522
Plaintiff:
Leroy Walton
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Kaseem Reed, Gary Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Bryant et al
as 1:2015cv02236
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Murphy Hickman
Defendant:
Sharon L. Bryant, Jeff Davis, Paula Frederick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Hardy et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 4:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Hardy , Michael Anthoney Bales , Justine David Ricks and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice and Sally Quillian Yates
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
MURPHY v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2015cv00072
Plaintiff:
YVONNE L MURPHY
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, HANCOCK COUNTY GEORGIA, RANDY KENT HARTZELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
