Cases 31 - 40 of 115
FITZPATRICK v. TOWNSHIP OF HAZLET et al
as 3:2020cv01779
Defendant:
ROBERT J. DICKENS, JOHN DOES 6-10, MICHAEL DUNCAN and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW S. FITZPATRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv19432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KAHN v. PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv19152
Defendant:
PHILLIPS 66 COMPANY, MICHAEL SANTOS, JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
SHAMIR KAHN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FORREST HILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. PUBLIC SERVICES ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv16692
Defendant:
PUBLIC SERVICES ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY, CHRISTOPHER WATSON and PHILLIP SCOTT
Plaintiff:
FORREST HILL COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. and GAYTHA KRAUSER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv15514
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. BERNAL et al
as 2:2019cv13426
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, ALEXY AYALA, CHARMAINE PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT et al
as 2:2019cv13427
Defendant:
ABC CORP. (1-20) (fictitious parties whose identies are not known), JOHN DOES #1-20, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT and others
Plaintiff:
CHARMAINE PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PINKSTON v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2019cv13285
Defendant:
OFFICER PHILLIP ZACCHE, OFFICER ROES 1-10, SGT. J. RANSOM and others
Plaintiff:
LEO PINKSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NETTER v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2019cv08398
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. NETTER
Defendant:
RICHARD STAGLIANO, BETTY ANN COWLING-CARSON, PHILLIP DUNTON MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06930
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
