Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Anderson v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2013cv02474
Plaintiff:
Darlene H. Anderson
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept., City of Memphis and Sandra Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dukes v. Metro Police Dept. et al
as 3:2012cv01225
Plaintiff:
David W. Dukes
Defendant:
Metro Police Dept., Stephen Holland, Steven Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montgomery v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2012cv02976
Plaintiff:
Samuel Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept., J. Clapp, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Esaw et al v. Metro Police Dept. et al
as 3:2012cv00639
Plaintiff:
Melanie A. Esaw and Quantiko A. Esaw
Defendant:
Metro Police Dept., Center Stone and Tennessee Carriers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Wharton et al
as 2:2012cv02488
Plaintiff:
Hattie King
Defendant:
AC Wharton, City of Memphis Police Dept., Charmeia Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyus v. Jackson et al
as 1:2011cv01224
Plaintiff:
Lawrence W. Tyus
Defendant:
Chad Jackson and Brownsville Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Church v. Metro Nashville Davidson County Police Dept.
as 3:2011cv00081
Plaintiff:
David D. Church, Sr.
Defendant:
Metro Nashville Davidson County Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Memphis Police Dept. et al
as 2:2010cv02863
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Mitchell
Defendant:
Memphis Police Dept., City of Memphis, S. Whitney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdullah v. Wilson et al
as 3:2010cv01076
Plaintiff:
Luqman Abdullah
Defendant:
Corey Wilson, Matt Dixson and Metro Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Redick et al
as 2:2010cv02432
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Kelly
Defendant:
B. Redick, M.P.D. Officer 2833 and Memphis Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
