Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Jackson v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00438
Defendant:
AIX Group, Richard Arnett, Paul Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Shonta Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Kissinger v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2017cv00011
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Stewart Hawkins, Becky Hill and others
Plaintiff:
William Kissinger, LA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Robinson
as 3:2017cv00002
Plaintiff:
Travis Henderson
Defendant:
Frank Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Moore et al v. LaSalle Corrections Inc et al
as 3:2016cv01007
Plaintiff:
Erie Moore, Jr , Tamara Green and Tiffany Robinson
Defendant:
LaSalle Corrections Inc, Ray Hanson, Christopher Loring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooker et al v. Campbell et al
as 3:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Ruby Hooker and Alice Hooker
Defendant:
Ricky Campbell, Police Jury of Franklin Parish, K W Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prevo v. Pennington et al
as 5:2016cv00230
Plaintiff:
ShaRunda Lynette Prevo
Defendant:
Jennifer Pennington, Vicky Haynes, Department of Children & Family Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trotter et al v. Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00033
Plaintiff:
Claudieus Gilliam, Leo Mitchell, Dwight Robinson and others
Defendant:
Lauren Engineers & Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
