Cases 31 - 40 of 99
Cornforth v. Clark et al
as 5:2017cv00888
Plaintiff:
Richard L Cornforth
Defendant:
Traci Clark, Phil Cole, William Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Huot v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 5:2017cv00745
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simpson et al v. Dewey County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2017cv00644
Plaintiff:
Mona Simpson
Defendant:
Dewey County Board of County Commissioners , Clay Sander and Cindy Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. Northwest Rogers County Fire Protection District et al
as 4:2017cv00320
Plaintiff:
Debra M Cooper
Defendant:
Northwest Rogers County Fire Protection District , James Mathew Shockley, Mel W Dainty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Grizzle v. Christian et al
as 6:2016cv00254
Plaintiff:
Kim Grizzle and Twila Grizzle
Defendant:
John Christian , Pontotoc County Board of County Commissioners , Arnold Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garza v. Walton et al
as 4:2016cv00147
Plaintiff:
Mark Garza
Defendant:
Scott Walton , Board of County Commissioners for Rogers County, Oklahoma and Shawn Fleming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. Railroad Retirement Board
as 5:2015cv01384
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Haynes
Defendant:
Railroad Retirement Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
