Cases 31 - 40 of 49
MONAGHAN et al v. CITY OF HACKENSACK et al
as 2:2013cv04544
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. MONAGHAN , FRANK CALLAHAN , DANNY CALLAHAN and others
Defendant:
CITY OF HACKENSACK , MAYOR & COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK , PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF HACKENSACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIOS v. CITY OF BAYONNE et al
as 2:2012cv04716
Plaintiff:
JASON RIOS
Defendant:
CITY OF BAYONNE, BAYONNE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF ROBERT KUBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FENNIE v. HUD et al
as 2:2012cv02254
Plaintiff:
TREASA M. FENNIE
Defendant:
HUD, N.J.M.H.F.A., NB UAW HOUSING CORP., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
EPIFAN v. ROMAN et al
as 3:2011cv02591
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY EPIFAN
Defendant:
FRANCISCO ROMAN, COUNTY OF SOMERSET, COUNTY OF SOMERSET BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00702
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv04337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMAS v. CITY OF CAMDEN THROUGH ITS POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2010cv00133
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN THROUGH ITS POLICE DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT ALVIE GRIMES, INVESTIGATOR BRIAN RICE and others
Plaintiff:
ROMAN THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EVANS v. PINTO et al
as 2:2009cv02462
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID EVANS
Defendant:
DAVID PINTO, DAN ROMAN, TOWNSHIP OF UNION POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
