Cases 31 - 40 of 63
Moran v. Unknown Nurse #1 et al
as 4:2013cv00413
Plaintiff:
Stephen Moran
Defendant:
Unknown Nurse #1, Tulsa County Jail , Tulsa County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Revilla et al v. Glanz et al
as 4:2013cv00315
Plaintiff:
Bridget Nicole Revilla , Deborah Young , Alma McCaffrey and others
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz, Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc., Correctional Healthcare Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Milkus v. Glanz et al
as 4:2013cv00120
Plaintiff:
Michael Milkus
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz , Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc., Correctional Healthcare Management Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKeever v. Glanz et al
as 4:2013cv00112
Plaintiff:
William McKeever
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz , Tulsa County Sheriff's Office , Correctional Healthcare Management of Oklahoma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Marsh v. Long et al
as 4:2012cv00504
Plaintiff:
Randall Marsh
Defendant:
David Long and Stanley Glanz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shaver v. Glanz et al
as 4:2012cv00234
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Dawn Shaver
Defendant:
Stanley Glanz and Seth Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
