Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv02854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Shaw v. City of Fostoria, et al
as 3:2009cv02109
Defendant:
City of Fostoria, Tiffaney Shaver and Unknown Officials
Plaintiff:
William Shaw and Holly Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00522
Plaintiff:
Micki I. Shaw and Micki I. Shaw
Defendant:
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc., Craig A. Bohning, Douglas E. Romer and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Hunter v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hunter
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Simon Leis, Jr., B Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harris v. Stickrath et al
as 2:2008cv00711
Plaintiff:
Deandre Harris
Defendant:
Thomas Stickrath, Paul Warye, Glenn VanDine and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rickels v. Cupp et al
as 3:2007cv01987
Plaintiff:
Romane J. Rickels
Defendant:
R. Cupp, S. Shaw, T. Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wood v. Mauer et al
as 1:2007cv00514
Plaintiff:
Calvin Wood
Defendant:
Terri Mauer, Joseph Harrison, Mr. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglass et al v. Shaw et al
as 2:2007cv00059
Plaintiff:
Christine Douglass, Christine Douglass, John J. Douglass, IV and others
Defendant:
Traci M. Shaw, Police Chief James G. Jackson, Columbus Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
