Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv63050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0754
EL v. STONE ET AL
as 4:2018cv00565
Defendant:
NATHAN STIDHAM, ANTHONY STONE and BRIAN SPEIGNER
Plaintiff:
GAMALIEL JAPHIA JOSEPH EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barberi v. CARRERAS MARBLE DESIGNERS, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv24915
Defendant:
JOSE CARRERAS, CITRINE QUARTZ STONE, INC. and CARRERAS MARBLE DESIGNERS, INC.
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv62707
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Stone et al v. Keisei Electric Railway Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv24040
Defendant:
Tsudanuma Central General Hospital, Yoshiharu Yano, U.S. Department of State and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Stone and Miyuki Suzuki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinds v. Stone et al
as 6:2018cv01450
Defendant:
City of Orlando Police Department, Hannah Crowe and Officer S. Stone
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hinds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barberi v. JEGAM STONES, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv22657
Defendant:
JEGAM STONES, INC. and JOHN ALEJANDRO GIRALDO
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv21912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stone et al v. Secretary, Florida Department of Children and Families et al
as 9:2018cv80623
Plaintiff:
Damian Stone and Brandi Lyn Stone
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Children and Families, Child Protective Investigator, Florida Department of Children and Families, Falon Gillepsie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv21646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
