Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Smith v. United States Government et al
as 8:2022cv01374
Defendant:
Eddie James & the Child Sex Traffickers w/ Kirk Franklin & Associates of Fulton Industrial Blvd, United States Government, Walmart and others
Plaintiff:
Naomi Ruth Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
RUSSELL v. JOHNSON et al
as 3:2022cv05320
Plaintiff:
RICHARD RUSSELL
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, AARON GOLEMAN, WALMART, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv02103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv24118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
O'Neal v. MacDill AFB et al
as 8:2021cv02576
Plaintiff:
Tarjal LaTrois O'Neal
Defendant:
MacDill AFB, Fort Jackson Army Instillation, Department of Economic Opportunity and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STROZIER v. WALMART INC et al
as 1:2021cv00155
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY STROZIER
Defendant:
WALMART INC and APEX MEDICAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
