Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe et al v. Trumbull County Children Services Board et al
as 4:2013cv00768
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Defendant:
Trumbull County Children Services Board, Robin Moon, Marilyn Pape and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv01543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Watkins v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2010cv01679
Defendant:
City of Akron and Officer Schismenos
Plaintiff:
Sarah Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCain v. State of Ohio Ex Rel the City of Warren et al
as 4:2010cv00349
Plaintiff:
Menford McCain
Defendant:
State of Ohio Ex Rel the City of Warren, Margaret Scott, Jeffrey Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Watkins v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2009cv01676
Plaintiff:
Ras-Simeon Watkins
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, City of Cleveland, City of Cleveland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Fleck-Kendrick v. Village of Valleyview et al
as 2:2009cv00456
Plaintiff:
Joshua Fleck-Kendrick
Defendant:
Village of Valleyview, Tom Watkins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Armstrong v. Watkins et al
as 4:2008cv01160
Plaintiff:
Shawn Armstrong
Defendant:
Dennis Watkins, County of Trumbull, Ohio, John Mandopoulos and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Watkins v. City of Toledo et al
as 3:2008cv00742
Plaintiff:
Larry Dean Watkins
Defendant:
City of Toledo and AFSCME Ohio Counsel 8, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
