Cases 31 - 40 of 59
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall, et al v. Summit County Court of Common Pleas, et al
as 5:2011cv00685
Plaintiff:
James Cody and Sharon Hall
Defendant:
Summit County Court of Common Pleas and Judith Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00214
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Ragland et al v. City of Chillicothe
as 2:2010cv00879
Plaintiff:
Franklin Ragland , Meri Kate Enterprises, LP , Thomas Gustin and others
Defendant:
City of Chillicothe, Richard Johnson, Michele Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
E.W.'s Hopeful Out Reach Ministries Inc. et al v. Slemmer et al
as 4:2010cv00799
Plaintiff:
E.W.'s Hopeful Out Reach Ministries Inc., Eddie James Williams, Sr. and Mary F. Williams
Defendant:
Tom Slemmer, National Church Residences, Tod's Crossing Senior Apartment Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Lucas et al
as 1:2010cv00615
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Williams
Defendant:
Lee Lucas, Robert Cross, John Ferster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Harris, III v. Lucas et al
as 1:2010cv00166
Plaintiff:
Robert Harris, III
Defendant:
Lee Michael Lucas, Robert Cross, John Ferster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mott v. Lucas et al
as 1:2010cv00164
Plaintiff:
Noel Mott
Defendant:
Lee Lucas, Robert Cross, John Ferester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
