Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00961
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smart Sober Living v. Sandy City
as 2:2018cv00806
Plaintiff:
Smart Sober Living
Defendant:
Sandy City, Kurt Bradburn, Tom Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Martinez v. Draper City et al
as 2:2017cv00772
Plaintiff:
Troy Martinez
Defendant:
Draper City , Draper Community Foundation, Troy Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Truman v. Orem City et al
as 2:2017cv00775
Plaintiff:
Conrad Truman
Defendant:
Orem City, Orem City Police Department, Thomas Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Malmstrom v. State of Utah Department of Children and Families et al
as 1:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Parker Malmstrom and Crystal Malmstrom
Defendant:
State of Utah Department of Children and Families , William Nebeker , Thomas Wade Malmstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation et al
as 2:2017cv00321
Plaintiff:
Grant Charles
Defendant:
Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation , Business Committee for the Ute Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation , Tribal Court for the Ute Tribe of the Uintah and Ouray Reservation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.