Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Woods v. Monroe County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2010cv00121
Plaintiff:
Roger Woods
Defendant:
Monroe County, Mississippi and Eric Sloan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00031
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brooks v. Noxubee General Hospital et al
as 4:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
Teressa Brooks
Defendant:
Noxubee General Hospital, Mukhtar Osmon, C. Dabbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00723
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lowe et al v. South Delta Regional Housing Authority, et al
as 4:2009cv00073
Plaintiff:
Hattie Lowe, Angela Cartlidge, Carolyn Richardson and others
Defendant:
South Delta Regional Housing Authority, Ms. A. J. Jefferson, Steve Oswalt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Woods v. The City of Pearl, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00337
Plaintiff:
Jerry D. Woods
Defendant:
The City of Pearl, Mississippi, Jimmy Foster, The Board of Aldermen and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
