Cases 451 - 460 of 9,281
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Price et al v. LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation et al
as 6:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Harold Price and Patricia A. Price
Defendant:
LaFaver Fiberglass Corporation and Bobby Joe LaFaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. PC Woodland Manor, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Renee Eileen Johnson
Defendant:
PC Woodland Manor, LLC, Bridge Property Management, LLC, RPM Living, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Brakebill v. Teal et al
as 5:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jerry Brakebill
Defendant:
Ronald Teal, Richard Tyler, Mike Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Harwell et al
as 5:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Mitchell, III
Defendant:
Capt Scott Harwell, Detective John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tahermandarjani v. Edmond City of et al
as 5:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Spencer Tahermandarjani
Defendant:
Edmond City of, JOHN DOE, 1 and JOHN DOE, 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Silsby v. Roberts et al
as 6:2023cv00103
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Silsby
Defendant:
Jarrod Roberts, David Buss, FNU Baltice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
