Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Duke v. Dept Human Services et al
as 6:2017cv00770
Defendant:
Dept Human Services, Lane Council Governments and Ellen Rosenblum
Plaintiff:
Victim Shayla M. Duke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00394
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00309
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ravenwood v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2016cv01960
Defendant:
Melissa Arnone, Juveen Buckner, Nicholas Burton and others
Plaintiff:
Minx Ravenwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv01038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00890
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Hubble v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision et al
as 6:2016cv00518
Plaintiff:
Celeste Davida Hubble
Defendant:
Lane County Circuit Court and Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2016cv00098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Henderson v. Emerald Property et al
as 6:2015cv02286
Defendant:
Emerald Property, Lane County Courts and Judge Josephine Mooney
Plaintiff:
Christine Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Lane Community College
as 6:2015cv01900
Defendant:
Lane Community College
Plaintiff:
James E. Ross
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
