Cases 41 - 48 of 48
RICHARDSON et al v. QUITMAN COUNTY, GEORGIA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
DENISE RICHARDSON and CALVIN RICHARDSON
Defendant:
QUITMAN COUNTY GEORGIA, STEVE NEWTON, COREY MASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belt v. Nolen et al
as 2:2010cv00146
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Belt
Defendant:
Shane Nolen and Keith Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Simpson v. Mason et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2009cv00145
Plaintiff:
Kevin J. Simpson
Defendant:
Keith Mason, Roderick Nohilly and Unknown Police Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv01281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007mi00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
The Illusions of the South, Inc. et al v. City of Valdosta et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 7:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
The Illusions of the South, Inc., The Illusions of the South, Inc., Robert Mason and others
Defendant:
City of Valdosta, Georgia, City of Valdosta, Georgia, City of Valdosta, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.