Cases 41 - 50 of 466
Brown et al v. Patton et al
as 5:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
George H Brown and Ruby R. Brown
Defendant:
Detective Austin Patton, Deputy Chris Rozar, Sheriff Doyle Wooten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Turner v. Lang et al
as 2:2021cv00239
Plaintiff:
Shane Ashley Turner
Defendant:
Kerri Ann Lang, Forsyth County, Forsyth County Sheriffs Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dukes v. Rogers
as 1:2021cv04397
Plaintiff:
Robert Charles Dukes
Defendant:
William H. Rogers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMUN ET LH WACHI NATION et al v. STATE COURT OF HOUSTON COUNTY et al
as 5:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
AMUN ET LH WACHI NATION, H E EMPRESS MONI'SOI SALIH ESHE HUMES RA EL BEY 1, MONICA LANELL HUMES ESTATE and others
Defendant:
STATE COURT OF HOUSTON COUNTY, ADMINISTRATOR JASON EDWARD ASHFORD, SOLICITOR AMY ELAINE SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02021
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WILLIAMS v. CASON et al
as 7:2021cv00057
Defendant:
THOMASVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and Officer MARCUS H CASON
Plaintiff:
FRED WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATHIS v. WEIGLE et al
as 5:2021cv00165
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TODD MATHIS
Respondent:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE and DISTRICT JUDGE MARC T TREADWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WILLIAMS v. CASON et al
as 7:2021cv00052
Defendant:
THOMASVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and MARCUS H CASON
Plaintiff:
FRED WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Austin v. Mellichamp et al
as 2:2021cv00078
Defendant:
Thomas A. Arrendale, Tomas M Hensley, Jr., Mylle Mangum and others
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Austin, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
