Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Robinson et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 2:2013cv00066
Plaintiff:
Scelia Robinson and Zack Lyde
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Amity House, Jeffrey Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lee v. Jamel Townsend et al
as 1:2012cv02061
Plaintiff:
Miles T. Lee
Defendant:
Jamel Townsend , Tracy Lawson Graham , Traci Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER et al v. BUTTS COUNTY GEORGIA et al
as 5:2012cv00209
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARTER , CLAYTON GRAHAM, JR and MITCHELL WEBSTER
Defendant:
BUTTS COUNTY GEORGIA, GENE POPE and TIMOTHY FILBECK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Lane Management, LLC
as 1:2012cv01332
Plaintiff:
Audrey Graham
Defendant:
Lane Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youhoing et al v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00733
Plaintiff:
Shennielle Shellielle Youhoing, Mahabir Nanan, Mohaberry D. Youhoing-Nanan and others
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Sheriff Department, Kemuel Kimbrough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buccini v. Graham, Brown, Reynolds & Hatchett, et al.
as 1:2012cv00298
Plaintiff:
K K Buccini
Defendant:
Graham, Brown, Reynolds & Hatchett, et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Farmer v. Jackson et al
as 1:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
Curtis S. Farmer
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson , James Carter , Michael Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
