Cases 41 - 50 of 615
W. v. Upper Darby School District
as 2:2022cv04347
Plaintiff:
Ka'Shaad W. and Taneesha H.
Defendant:
Upper Darby School District
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
NAESSENS v. BRESLIN et al
as 2:2022cv03636
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GERARD NAESSENS
Defendant:
FRANK BRESLIN, ANDREW J. BARRON, LAWRENCE H. RICHARDSON, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darien Rowayton Bank v. McGregor et al
as 4:2022cv01394
Plaintiff:
Darien Rowayton Bank d/b/a DR Bank
Defendant:
Jack McGregor, Joannah McGregor and Douglas H. McGregor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
H. et al v. Carbondale Area School District
as 3:2022cv01365
Plaintiff:
Kastiel H., Jade S. and Quincy H.
Defendant:
Carbondale Area School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
FOSTER v. SLOMSKY et al
as 2:2022cv03349
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK D. FOSTER
Defendant:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, CLERKS TO BE NAMED, LANDON Y. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight, II v. Wilson et al
as 1:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
Lawrence H. Knight, II
Defendant:
Judge Jennifer P. Wilson and Judge Martin Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
