Cases 41 - 50 of 94
OWENS v. AMBROISE et al
as 3:2017cv07159
Plaintiff:
JANEAN OWENS
Defendant:
BRIAN AMBROISE, WILLIAM ANDERSON, WILLIAM HAUCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CERWINSKI et al v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2010cv06830
Plaintiff:
LIEUTENANT THOMAS J. CERWINSKI, SERGEANT WALTER ZAPOLUCH and SHERIFF OFFICER ALEX PINO
Defendant:
JUAN PEREZ, CHIEF JOHN BARTUCCI, LIEUTENANT JOSE GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PELLE v. PEREZ et al
as 2:2017cv04623
Plaintiff:
TODD PELLE
Defendant:
R. PEREZ, JOSEPH LARKINS, ANTHONY CANCEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NASH et al v. COUNTY OF MERCER et al
as 3:2017cv03648
Plaintiff:
MONICA NASH , HECTOR NAZARIO , TE'AMO NASH and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MERCER, MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JOSEPH TUCCILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CHEATHAM v. JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2016cv08824
Plaintiff:
TERELL CHEATHAM
Defendant:
JERSEY CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT , CITY OF JERSEY CITY , ANDREW J. BARELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STOVALL v. GRAZIOLI et al
as 1:2016cv04839
Plaintiff:
FLAVIA STOVALL
Defendant:
JAMES GRAZIOLI , LOUIS NARVAEZ , GILBERTO VELASQUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SIMMONS v. LOUIS et al
as 2:2016cv04189
Plaintiff:
VAUGHN SIMMONS
Defendant:
KENNETH LOUIS, BEATRICE GOLDEN, DENISE BIVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv04139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DAVIS et al v. PEREZ et al
as 1:2016cv02784
Plaintiff:
NOEL DAVIS and DHAMEER WHITE
Defendant:
MICHAEL PEREZ and VOORHEES TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
