Cases 41 - 50 of 65
FLEWELLEN v. MACON BIBB GEORGIA et al
as 5:2015cv00086
Plaintiff:
SHAWN FLEWELLEN
Defendant:
MACON BIBB GEORGIA, CITY OF MACON, MIKE BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BRINSON v. LEWIS et al
as 5:2015cv00043
Plaintiff:
BRYANT BRINSON
Defendant:
SHARRELL LEWIS , MAURICE CLOWERS and BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HORN v. MACON et al
as 5:2014cv00364
Plaintiff:
DEEANN HORN
Defendant:
CITY OF MACON , MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT , MACON BIBB COUNTY GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Morris et al v. Macon/Bibb County City/County Consolidated Government et al
as 1:2014cv00892
Plaintiff:
Olsen Bernard Morris , J.C.P. , C.S.K. and others
Defendant:
Macon/Bibb County City/County Consolidated Government, Jerry Modena, LaKay Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
KELSEY v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 5:2013cv00285
Plaintiff:
KAMERON B KELSEY
Defendant:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, MACON GEORGIA, BIBB COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. Macon-Bibb County Board of Elections et al
as 5:2013cv00232
Plaintiff:
MALLORY C JONES
Defendant:
Macon-Bibb County Board of Elections and JEANETTA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
