Cases 41 - 50 of 4,789
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dillard v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04396
Defendant:
CW Martin, Jr, City of Chicago and M K Ingram
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Dillard, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKenzie v. Ferrantella et al
as 1:2024cv04353
Plaintiff:
Charles McKenzie
Defendant:
K.D. Ferrantella, City of Chicago and M.D. Piskorek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Patrick v. Spradley et al
as 1:2024cv04377
Defendant:
Jake Schmeisser, Ravyn Morgan, Timothy Lammert and others
Plaintiff:
Kiyan Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathis v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04278
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Mathis
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, R. Collins, J. Helsternwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04197
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Lim v. NY State Board
as 24-10447
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, Singapore Telecommunications Private Limited, City of Chicago, Illinois and others
Streeter et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04158
Defendant:
John Doe, Kenneth Sunde, Richard Rodriguez, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Jovan Streeter and Marquita Beecham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03941
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Logan v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
Leonard Logan
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Glenn Evans, Alejandro Almazan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
