Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus, et al v. Wisan, et al
as 11-4066
Plaintiff - Appellee: FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant: DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Defendant: BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah and THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Intervenor: RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Movant: JONATHAN HARKER, HYRUM HARKER and HARKER DAIRY FARM
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus v. Wisan (Intervenors' Appeal), et al
as 11-4059
Plaintiff - Appellee: FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant: BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah, THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona and others
Intervenor - Appellant: RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus v. Wisan, et al
as 11-4053
Plaintiff - Appellee: FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant: BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust
Defendant: MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah, THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona and DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Defendant-Intervenor: RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus v. Wisan, et al
as 11-4050
Plaintiff - Appellee: FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant: MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah
Defendant: THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona, BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust and DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Defendant-Intervenor: RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Fundamentalist Church of Jesus v. Wisan (Horne Appeal), et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-4049
Plaintiff - Appellee: FUNDAMENTALIST CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS, an Association of Individuals
Defendant - Appellant: THOMAS C. HORNE, Attorney General for the State of Arizona
Defendant: BRUCE R. WISAN, Special Fiduciary of the United Effort Plan Trust, MARK L. SHURTLEFF, Attorney General for the State of Utah and DENISE POSSE LINDBERG, Judge of the Third Judicial District Court of Salt Lake County, State of Utah
Intervenor: RICHARD JESSOP REAM, THOMAS SAMUEL STEED, DON RONALD FISCHER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-4040
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00095
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0623
Hackford et al v. State of Utah et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00084
Plaintiff: Richita Marie Hackford, Richard D. Hackford, Nathan S. Collett and others
Defendant: State of Utah , Duchesne County, Roosevelt City Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01252
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mandell v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00216
Defendant: Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Plaintiff: Cheryl A. Mandell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?