Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00408
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00270
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Belt et al v. Carter et al
as 5:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
Chris Belt and Mychal Denale Davis
Defendant:
Edward Tyrone Carter, Leslie Allen Duncan and City of Oak Grove, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lea v. United States Department of Agriculture - Office of Civil Rights et al
as 1:2013cv00110
Plaintiff:
Corey Lea
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture - Office of Civil Rights, Tom Vilsack, Joe Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Seger v. Lancaster, Kentucky et al
as 5:2012cv00384
Plaintiff:
Shaun Seger
Defendant:
City of Lancaster, Kentucky , Brenda Powers , Bret Baierlein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lea v. United States Department of Agriculture - Office of Civil Rights et al
as 1:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Corey Lea
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture - Office of Civil Rights, Tom Vilsack, Joe Leonard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
