Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Evans v. City and County of Denver
as 1:2011cv00406
Plaintiff:
Roy D. Evans, III
Defendant:
City and County of Denver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Weatherspoon v. Miller et al
as 1:2011cv00312
Plaintiff:
Bettie Weatherspoon
Defendant:
Rohn David Miller, Gizela Miller, Rachel Blandin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wagner v. Hartley et al
as 1:2010cv02501
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wagner
Defendant:
Steve Hartley, Travis Trani, James Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bark v. Chacon et al
as 1:2010cv01570
Plaintiff:
Evan Bark
Defendant:
Mike Chacon, City of Colorado Springs, The and El Paso County, Colorado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dykes et al v. Chambers et al
as 1:2010cv01450
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Dykes and Robert Clough
Defendant:
Sherry Chambers, Leah Audin, Karen Rios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marzonie et al v. Brauch Enterprises II et al
as 1:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
Michael James Marzonie, Jr., Mark Andrew Larson, Larson & Larimer P.C. and others
Defendant:
Brauch Enterprises II, N. Gayle Brauch and Earl Brauch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01806
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Union Baptist Church et al v. Murphy et al
as 1:2008cv00848
Plaintiff:
Union Baptist Church, Gregory (I) D. Johnson, Gregory D. Johnson and others
Defendant:
Bradshaw (I) Murphy, Bradshaw Murphy, Calvin (I) Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Evans et al v. Koch
as 1:2007cv00934
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Evans and Entrance Solution
Defendant:
Kathryn Koch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
