Cases 41 - 50 of 156
Donald Welch, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 15-16598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD WELCH, ANTHONY DUK and AARON BITZER
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, in his official capacity, DENISE BROWN, Case Manager, Director of Consumer Affairs, in her official capacity, HARRY DOUGLAS and others
Amicus Curiae:
EQUALITY CALIFORNIA
Berman et al v. Brown et al
as 5:2015cv03282
Plaintiff:
Michael S Berman and Darrell B Stapp
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Jeffrey A. Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyatt v. Brown et al
as 1:2015at00517
Plaintiff:
Tom Hyatt
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyatt v. Brown, et al.
as 1:2015cv00955
Plaintiff:
Tom Hyatt
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Brown et al
as 1:2015at00496
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Matthew Cate, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Byrn v. Brown et al
as 1:2015at00497
Plaintiff:
Jason Byrn
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Matthew Cate, Jeffrey Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pearlman v. Brown et al
as 1:2015at00480
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Matthew Cate, Jeffrey Beard and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Pearlman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgos v. Brown et al
as 1:2015at00441
Plaintiff:
Richard Burgos
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Jeffrey Beard, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Brown et al
as 1:2015at00442
Plaintiff:
Terrence Harris
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Arnold Schwarzenegger, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgos v. Brown, et al.
as 1:2015cv00814
Plaintiff:
Richard Burgos
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Jeffrey Beard, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
