Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Wright v. Temple of Deliverance et al
as 2:2011cv02381
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Temple of Deliverance, 503 & 504 Disability Act and U.S. Tennessee Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. U.S. Military Millington et al
as 2:2011cv02363
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
U.S. Military Millington, Memphis Police & Sherriff, U.S. TN Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. H&M International et al
as 2:2011cv02356
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
H&M International, Noel Melindez and Cricket Cell Phones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Carter et al
as 2:2011cv02334
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Alycia Carter, Erie Perkins, Louise Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wright v. Cricket et al
as 2:2011cv02280
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Cricket, U.S. Government, Memphis Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. M.P.D. et al
as 2:2011cv02266
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
M.P.D., U.S.Government, Steve Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Adverse Marketing Law et al
as 2:2011cv02124
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Adverse Marketing Law, Falsified Marketing and Solisutational Marketing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Adverse Solisation Law et al
as 2:2011cv02105
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Adverse Solisation Law, False Advertisement Law and Invasion of Privacy Law
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Todd et al
as 2:2011cv02103
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
Charles Todd, Danielle Dreysen, Alycia Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Lammey et al
as 2:2011cv02092
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rodney Wright
Defendant:
James Lammey, United States Broadcasting Company and Urban Spy Cam, Illegal Surveilance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
