Cases 41 - 50 of 100
Culberth v. The Town of East Hampton New York et al
as 2:2018cv04796
Defendant:
Barry Johnson, Frank Trotta and The Town of East Hampton New York
Plaintiff:
William E. Culberth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hampton v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv07755
Defendant:
Sergeant Peter Congalosi, The City of New York and John Doe and Jane Doe #1-5
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Costantino et al v. The Village of Quogue et al
as 2:2018cv04433
Plaintiff:
Erminia Costantino and Keith Sterling
Defendant:
Daniel Rodgers, The Village of Quogue, Richard Rosenthal Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sausa v. Village of West Hampton Dunes et al
as 2:2018cv03802
Defendant:
Village of West Hampton Dunes, Robert Kalfur, Joseph W. Prokop and others
Plaintiff:
maria Sausa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sausa et al v. Vegliante et al
as 2:2018cv03800
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, #1-10, Joseph W. Prokop, Gary Vegliante and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Kalfur and maria Sausa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Brown v. Hampton et al
as 1:2017cv08166
Plaintiff:
Nkosi Sadiki Brown
Defendant:
Jonathan Clayton Hampton and Michele E. Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932
Hampton v. Shulkin
as 2:2017cv05711
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hampton
Defendant:
David J. Shulkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
