Cases 41 - 50 of 1,307
Pink v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Administrator John Pink and Diann Pink
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K. Jones, Anthony Abdullah, Jamie Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sams v. City of Norton, et al
as 5:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Jason Sams
Defendant:
Norton, City of, Robert Fowler, Mayor Michael Zita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pink v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00420
Plaintiff:
Administrator John Pink
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K Jones, Anthony Abdullah, Jamie Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pink v. Jones et al
as 1:2023oe00420
Plaintiff:
Administrator John Pink
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard K Jones, Anthony Abdullah, Jamie Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Urbanski v. Doe 1, et al
as 3:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Richard Urbanski, II
Defendant:
Deputy John Doe 1 and Deputy John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
