Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Campbell v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv05422
Plaintiff:
Clive C. Campbell
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Police Officer, John Doe #2, Police Officer, John Doe #3, Police Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maldonado et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv02862
Defendant:
Police Officer Henny Fernandez, Police Officer John Doe #1, Police Officer John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge LLuis, Adrian Maldonado and Albert Maldonado, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riley v. Alford et al
as 1:2010cv00218
Defendant:
Mark Alford, James Allandydy, Michael Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Yarborough v. New York City et al
as 1:2010cv02125
Defendant:
Ms. (Jane) Gaston, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Alisa Yarborough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayol v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2010cv02024
Defendant:
City Of New York, Rhonda Eastman, Robert Ellington and others
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Mayol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beckles v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 1:2010cv01937
Plaintiff:
Andre Beckles
Defendant:
John Doe #1 through John Doe #3 and U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Russ v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2010cv01370
Police Officer At 73 Pct:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and John Doe #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Atherly v. Nationscredit Financial Services Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv01281
:
Defendant:
Shari Harrel, John Doe #1 through John Doe #3, Nationscredit Financial Services Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Edwards v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01047
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer John Doe #1, Police Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
