Cases 41 - 50 of 330
DOE v. CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 3:2022cv00047
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SPIVEY v. HANCOCK et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF BILLY HANCOCK, CPT JOE ARZOLA, SGT JACK MASTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haase v. Yasin et al
as 1:2022cv01136
Defendant:
Mary Am Sakinah Yasin, Mary Ams Yasin, Mary Am Ya-Sin and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Haase
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 3:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Maybrey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
SPIVEY v. HUMPHREY et al
as 5:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN HUMPHREY, MALONE, DR JOHN ROWLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
SPIVEY v. WARDEN et al
as 5:2021cv00398
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
UNKNOWN WARDEN, ASSISTANT WARDEN A W UNKNOWN, PSYCHOLOGICAL TEAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karva et al v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A. et al
as 1:2021cv04557
Plaintiff:
Diquita Romance Karva, Quita Romer, Diquita Romer and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank N.A., MERS CORP Holdings, Inc, Vape Karva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Starks v. Dawson et al
as 1:2021cv04396
Plaintiff:
William L. Starks
Defendant:
James Dawson, Louis Deckmar, Lundy Mayberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. City of Covington, Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04365
Plaintiff:
Warren Cortiss and Barbara Watkins
Defendant:
City of Covington, Georgia, Officer Kinsley Nichols, Officer Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
