Cases 41 - 50 of 705
Wright v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03298
Plaintiff:
Ervin Wright
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Ronald Watts, Brian Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nanez v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03162
Plaintiff:
Francisco Nanez
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Almendarez v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
Arthur Almendarez
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Galvan v. Switski et al
as 1:2023cv03158
Plaintiff:
John Galvan
Defendant:
Victor Switski, James Hanrahan, Leroy Almanza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv03144
Plaintiff:
Isiah Jones
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Former CPD Sergeant Ronald Watts, Robert Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Shiver et al
as 3:2023cv50164
Defendant:
Jane McFee, Donald Shiver, Carpenter's Place and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Anderson et al v. Yoon et al
as 1:2023cv02245
Plaintiff:
Tim Anderson, Megan Angers, Elizia Artis and others
Defendant:
Superintendent David Brown, City Of Chicago, John Doe Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wigman et al
as 3:2023cv50105
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Smith
Defendant:
Gary Wigman, Michael Kostecki, William Brogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
