Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Collins et al v. Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC et al
as 5:2012cv02677
Plaintiff:
Morton Collins and Kim Collins
Defendant:
Ford Motor Credit Company, LLC , Mazda of Kent Customer Relations Dept. and Mazda American Credit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stolle v. Kent State University et al
as 5:2012cv01488
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stolle
Defendant:
Kent State University, John Thornton, Richard Kolbe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Foster v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
as 2:2011cv00133
Petitioner:
Kent C. Foster
Respondent:
Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bunting v. Miller et al
as 2:2010cv00411
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Bunting
Defendant:
Michele Miller, Kent Litzenberger, Jay Meager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Webster IV v. City of Kent, Ohio et al
as 5:2010cv00599
Plaintiff:
Paul T. Webster IV
Defendant:
City of Kent, Ohio, City of Kent, Ohio Police Department, Michael Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foster v. Mausser et al
as 2:2009cv01094
Plaintiff:
Kent C. Foster
Defendant:
Cynthia Mausser, Kathleen Kovach, Robert Maszczynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Crowe v. City of Kent et al
as 5:2009cv02583
Plaintiff:
Kaitlin Crowe
Defendant:
City of Kent, James Prusha, John Doe Police Officer No. #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
