Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Buckhaulter et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00545
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Buckhaulter and Louis Brooks, Jr.
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Butler et al v. Ramkabir of America et al
as 3:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Butler , Magellan Lockett and Ray Evans
Defendant:
Ramkabir of America, Choice Hotels International, Inc., Hari Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Glover v. Jackson County, MS Sheriff Dept. et al
as 4:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Glover
Defendant:
Jackson County, MS Sheriff Dept. and Wayne Co., MS Sheriff Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Harris v. Jeffries et al
as 3:2009cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kimberly C. Harris
Defendant:
Tamara Jeffries, Thomas Crouch and Marshall County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Luster v. Kimberly-Clark Credit Union
as 1:2009cv00261
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Luster
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Luster v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00233
Plaintiff:
Cheryl D. Luster
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
