Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thompson v. Cincinnati et al
as 1:2010cv00708
Plaintiff:
Elliot Thompson
Defendant:
City Of Cincinnati, Patrick Caton and Anthony Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Koster et al
as 5:2010cv02095
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Murphy
Defendant:
Ryan Koster, Paul Brumme, William Rickett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dehlendorf v. City Of Gahanna, Ohio et al
as 2:2010cv00623
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Dehlendorf
Defendant:
City Of Gahanna, Ohio, Rebecca Stinchcomb, Dennis Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walters et al v. NaphCare, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00136
Plaintiff:
Debra Walters, Debra Walters, Homer Ritter and others
Defendant:
NaphCare, Inc., NaphCare, Inc, Harley G Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Eicher v. Westrick, et al
as 3:2009cv00475
Plaintiff:
David A. Eicher
Defendant:
David, Sheriff of De J. Westrick, Mark, Deputy Sheriff Denning, Diana Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fair Housing Resource Center, Inc. v. DJM'S 4 Reasons Ltd et al
as 1:2008cv02848
Plaintiff:
Fair Housing Resource Center, Inc.
Defendant:
DJM'S 4 Reasons Ltd. and Dudley Murphy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hicks v. City of Barberton et al
as 5:2008cv01579
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hicks
Defendant:
City of Barberton, Barberton Police Department, Michael L. Weigand and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jackson v. City Of Gahanna, Ohio et al
as 2:2008cv00068
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Jackson
Defendant:
City Of Gahanna, Ohio, Sheila Murphy and Dennis Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
