Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Adirondack Advertising, LLC v. City of Plattsburgh, New York et al
as 8:2012cv01684
Plaintiff:
Adirondack Advertising, LLC
Defendant:
City of Plattsburgh, New York and Joseph McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMahon v. Russo et al.
as 7:2012cv03772
Plaintiff:
James McMahon
Defendant:
Salvatore Russo, City of Port Jervis, Sgt. Hockenberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Hara v. Raniere et al
as 1:2012cv00252
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. O'Hara
Defendant:
Keith A. Raniere, Nancy Salzman, Kristin Keeffe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dumont v. Bassett Medical Center et al
as 3:2011cv00974
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Dumont
Defendant:
Bassett Medical Center, Stephen J. Dehorn, Craig R. Henson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hasan El v. United States Attorney General-Main Office
as 1:2011cv05506
Plaintiff:
Abdul Muqaddim Hasan El
Defendant:
United States Attorney General-Main Office, The Honorable Judge Colleen McMahon-US District Court Judge, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McMahon v. Russo et al
as 7:2011cv01210
Plaintiff:
James McMahon
Defendant:
Salvatore Russo, City of Port Jervis, Hockenberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cutie et al v. Sheehan et al
as 1:2011cv00066
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Cutie and Cutie Pharma-Care, Inc.
Defendant:
James G. Sheehan, Angelo J. Ruperto, Martin McMahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
