Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Harper v. County of Kern et al
as 1:2014cv01603
Plaintiff:
Alexander F Harper
Defendant:
County of Kern, Cynthia Norris, Melissa Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Brown et al v. City of Anaheim et al
as 8:2014cv01195
Plaintiff:
Richard Brown and Kristine Hedley
Defendant:
Curtis Bryant, Curtis Bryant, City of Anaheim and others
Abrams v. Norris et al
as 1:2014cv03295
Plaintiff:
Karen Abrams
Defendant:
David Norris and Lakeport Unified School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thymes v. People of the State of California et al
as 5:2014cv02377
Plaintiff:
John A. Thymes
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ken Norris v. Department of Motor Vehicles et al
as 2:2012cv08434
Defendant:
Department of Motor Vehicles, Jane Doe, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Norris
Timothy Lewis Whiting v. Stan Henry et al
as 5:2011cv00552
Defendant:
Adams, Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Agua Caliente Casino Resort Spa and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lewis Whiting
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv05197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv05197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hardesty et al v. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District et al
as 2:2010at01317
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hardesty and Yvette Hardesty
Defendant:
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, David Gross, James Goldstene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardesty et al v. Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District et al
as 2:2010cv02414
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hardesty and Yvette Hardesty
Defendant:
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District, David Gross, James Goldstene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
