Cases 41 - 50 of 57
JOHNSON v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2010cv06669
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CENTENO v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2010cv06667
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY CENTENO
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAILEY v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2010cv06671
Plaintiff:
JHERELLE BAILEY
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAYLOCK v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2010cv06666
Plaintiff:
DAWONE BAYLOCK
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BLACKSON v. PARRY et al
as 1:2010cv06390
Plaintiff:
MUHAMMAD BLACKSON
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARSTARPHEN v. PARRY et al
as 1:2010cv06389
Plaintiff:
RHONDA CARSTARPHEN
Defendant:
KEVIN MICHAEL PARRY, JASON STETSER, ROBERT BAYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MILLS et al v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2010cv06277
Plaintiff:
RON MILLS , ANGEL CARABALLO , WILLIAM BAYLOCK and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BECERRA v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2010cv06073
Plaintiff:
GILBERT BECERRA
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROLAX v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2010cv05474
Plaintiff:
ANTWYNE ROLAX
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. CITY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2010cv04757
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CAMDEN COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
