Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Fields v. Benningfield et al
as 1:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jerry Fields
Defendant:
Rick Benningfield, Eddie "Hack" Marcum, Taylor County Fiscal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rogers et al v. O'Donnell et al
as 5:2010cv00373
Plaintiff:
James J. Rogers , Garry Murphy and Brian Hensley
Defendant:
Nelson O'Donnell, The Madison County Sheriff's Department, David W. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browning et al v. Harlan County et al
as 6:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
Jayne Browning
Defendant:
Harlan County , Steve Duff and Roger Dean Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Buckner v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Parks, Tourism, Arts & Heritage Cabinet et al
as 3:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
Leroy Buckner
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Department of Parks, Tourism, Arts & Heritage Cabinet and Roger Bryant, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Minnifield v. Brown
as 3:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Minnifield
Defendant:
Charlie Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rawlings et al v. Cabinet for Health and Family Services Division et al
as 3:2010cv00002
Plaintiff:
Linda S. Rawlings, Reuben C. Rawlings, Ashley N. Rawlings and others
Defendant:
Cabinet for Health and Family Services, Malcomb Leatherwood, Dickey David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Willock v. Rogers et al
as 3:2009cv00193
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Willock and Rhonda Willock
Defendant:
Joseph L. Rogers and Donnie Tinnell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
