Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROGERS v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv08872
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROGERS
Defendant:
GERARD SMITH, MICHAEL DACHISEN, PETER KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROGERS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2016cv08870
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ROGERS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and MAN WITH NJ STATE TROOPER ID 7789
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
ROGERS v. SATAN GOD et al
as 2:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROGERS
Defendant:
SATAN GOD, BARAK OBAMA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ESTATE OF JERMANE CAMERON REID et al v. CITY OF BRIDGETON et al
as 1:2015cv07611
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF JERMANE CAMERON REID , SHEILA REID and ASHLEY BENITEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF BRIDGETON, BRAHEME L. DAYS, ROGER W. WORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
as 1:2015cv05691
Plaintiff:
ROGER BRYANT, SR.
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THE ESTATE OF JERAME CAMERON REID et al v. CITY OF BRIDGETON et al
as 1:2015cv01831
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF JERAME CAMERON REID and LAWANDA M. REID
Defendant:
CITY OF BRIDGETON , BRAHEME L. DAYS , ROGER W. WORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT et al
as 3:2014cv08029
Plaintiff:
SUSAN ROGERS
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT , BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT POLICE DEPARTMENT , MATTHEW F. NICKERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
